All the news that fits

16-Mar-10


Audit Commission recommends clawback on payments to failing chief executives who find similar jobs in another council

Under-performing council chiefs are being paid six-figure sums to quit only to find another job at a different council, the local government watchdog reports today.

Councils have paid on average nearly £260,000 each to 37 chief executives since 2006 - and one in six of them returned to work in a similar job in a different region. The local government secretary, John Denham, who ordered the report from the Audit Commission, demanded action to prevent taxpayers' money being wasted on the "boomerang bosses".

His shadow secretary, Bob Neill, said that there should be "no reward for failure" and called for greater transparency.

More than a third of council chief executives leaving their jobs between 2007 and 2009 received compensation. In six cases studied by the Audit Commission a chief executive was re-employed in a senior managerial position in another council within 12 months.

The average cost of payments to councils was 1.8 times the chief executive's annual basic salary. In four cases, it was more than three times that salary. One was paid more than £500,000 to leave a job.

The report concluded that the average payment was £256,104, while 34% received more than £300,000. A total of £9.5m was paid out during the three-year period of the study.

More than six out of seven councils said that "relationship breakdown" was a factor in paying off council chiefs. These often followed a change in political leadership of the authority. Councils were too quick to pay off a poorly performing chief executive instead of sacking them for incompetence and that left them free to get a job in a similar area, the report suggested.

It argues that councils should be able to claw back payoffs win the event of a chief executive going on to get another high-paid job in a different local authority. The report recommends that councils should publish the salaries of the top executives and details of severance packages shortly after they are agreed. It also says councils should also work harder to avoid relationships with chief executives breaking down and have better appraisal systems in place.

Denham welcomed the recommendations, saying: "The Audit Commission report shows that too many chief executives are being dismissed because they have fallen out with council leaders - this can cost as much as £500,000 and is all too often seen as a quick-fix solution. Taxpayers' money should not be used to resolve personal differences."

The minister wrote to Margaret Eaton, chair of the Local Government Association, urging the rapid adoption of the commission's recommendations.

Neill said: "Such payments are an outrageous waste of taxpayers' money and an affront to families facing soaring council tax bills. There should be no rewards for failure, either in the public or private sector. There needs to be clearer guidance discouraging such redundancy payments and greater transparency about the pay and perks of senior town hall staff."

The Audit Commission chairman, Michael O'Higgins, said: "There have been a lot of assertions made on this subject against the backdrop of concerns about public sector pay generally.

"Now the Audit Commission is laying out the facts and making recommendations aimed at protecting the public purse, as well as the rights of chief executives and council leaders."

Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Desire for change makes poll bleak reading for Brown [ 16-Mar-10 5:00am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Two-thirds think Britain needs new leadership, but this does not mean there is enthusiasm about Tory alternative

Voters think it is time for a change, and that Gordon Brown cannot provide it. These two facts emerge repeatedly from the latest Guardian/ICM poll, which exposes the theoretical potential for - but not likelihood of - a substantial opposition win.

The poll shows 68% think Britain needs a new government and prime minister. Only 27% agree continuity matters most, and Labour deserves another term.

Those are bleak figures for the governing party and consistent ones. When ICM first asked the question in September 2006, 70% wanted change. In January this year 66% said the same.

This does not mean voters are enthusiastic about the Conservative alternative. But faced with a choice, they mildly prefer it to five more years of Brown. Even 38% of people who voted Labour in 2005 say it is now time for a change. This group - people who may switch their votes - will obviously be crucial on polling day. The ICM data shows the Conservatives hanging on to around 94% of their 2005 supporters, while only 73% of former Labour backers remain loyal. Unless this latter figure increases, it will be impossible for Labour to win.

Some recent polls have put Labour support at or close to its 2005 election score, but the scale of defection suggests this is unlikely to be the case. While many former Labour voters now back no party, others have shifted to the Lib Dems and Conservatives in almost equal proportions.

Experian, the market research company whose Mosaic database is used by all parties to identify groups who may change sides, recently identified "motorway man" - over-represented in Conservative target margins, with high personal debt and more drawn to Tony Blair than Brown.The company's analysis of current YouGov polls found this group was moving to the Conservatives in large numbers. Labour is also losing above average proportions of poorer voters who have retired or live in former industrial towns, although not many are moving to the Conservatives. Richer voters, while less likely to have backed Labour in the first place, are less likely to have moved away. People in the "liberal opinions" category are also more likely to have stayed loyal to Labour, although many also back the Lib Dems.

Brown's leadership is not the only thing they dislike about Labour, but it is not popular. Only 43% of those who voted Labour in 2005 think Brown is reaching out to their concerns. Only 57% think he is the man likely to take Britain in the right direction over the next few years.

A large core vote remains loyal. But many parts of the electoral coalition that won Labour three elections in a row are unconvinced they should vote Labour again.

The Conservative leader, David Cameron, is not popular either: only 42% of all voters think he looks the most competent prime minister and only 39% think he will take Britain in the right direction. But he has the edge on Brown.

The chink in Conservative armour is economic policy. The poll suggests Tory talk of cuts is alarming voters. Before next week's budget a narrow plurality backs Labour's talk of sustaining spending to promote economic growth, ahead of Tory talk of immediate cuts to restrict debt.

Opinion is split: 48% to 46%. Each party has a sizeable number of supporters who back the other side's case: 35% of Conservatives want spending sustained and 38% of Labour voters think cutting debt is the priority. Lib Dems prefer spending to cuts by 58% to 39%.

But a series of policy questions shows the Tory message is getting through. The party has an 13-point lead over Labour as the one most likely to bring economic growth, and a 28-point lead as the one most likely to cut the deficit. It only has a four-point lead as the one most likely to raise taxes, which suggests that the party's austerity message has eroded the Tories' traditional association with tax cuts.

The poll suggests voters are looking for change, but do not know what that implies, or who is best placed to provide it. That uncertainty could lead to shifts in party support during the election campaign. If not, Labour's chances of holding on to power look slim.

Julian Glover
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


British Airways strikers face terminal five ban [ 16-Mar-10 5:00am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Airline's main base at Heathrow is on private land, but pickets are expected at seven other locations around airport

British Airways cabin crew will be barred from picketing the airline's main Heathrow base if a strike goes ahead.

Terminal Five, which processes the vast majority of BA's Heathrow passengers, will be the main location for a strike-breaking workforce of about 1,000 volunteer staff.

It is understood that under a "picketing protocol" drawn up by BAA, Heathrow's owner, striking airline staff are not allowed to picket the T5 site which is on privately owned land.

There are about seven sites at Heathrow where pickets can stand, including Hatton Cross tube station and the Heathrow airport police station. The closest picketing spot to T5 is at a roundabout off the A3044.

A BAA spokesman said the airport would remain open even if its largest user, accounting for about 40% of flights, is disrupted by a walkout.

"Whether there is strike action or not, Heathrow will remain open for business and we advise passengers to follow the advice given to them by BA."

Representatives of Unite's cabin crew branch Bassa, met police today to discuss picketing arrangements - the first picket lines operated by Bassa since a BA walkout nearly 13 years ago.

Dan Milmo
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


o Extra £60-80bn cost predicted over next 20 years
o Public 'not prepared' for cuts or new charges

Britain's political class is accused today of a pre-election conspiracy of silence over how to meet rising financial demands on the welfare state, estimated at an extra £60bn-£80bn over the next two decades.

The stark warning is made by an all-party commission on 2020 public services led by Sir Andrew Foster, the former chief executive of the Audit Commission. It includes Stephen Dorrell, the former Conservative health secretary who is David Cameron's public services adviser, and Mathew Taylor, former head of policy to No 10 during Tony Blair's premiership.

"We are emerging from the longest recession since the 1930s and facing huge challenges," Foster said. "But what we are being offered by politicians is a narrow and limited set of choices - cut now or cut later. We cannot just go on doing the same things with less money. If we do, we will continue to fail those who rely on public services the most."

In a report prepared for the commission by the LSE economist Prof Howard Glennerster, published today, future demand pressures on the welfare state is put at an extra 4.4% of GDP in the next 20 years and 6% if free personal care for elderly is included. That amounts to between £60bn and £80bn in extra demand.

By 2060 the real-terms extra demand on the welfare state will have reached an astronomical 8%-10% of GDP.

Glennerster warns: "Nowhere in the current political debate are these dilemma openly recognised by politicians. None of the crisis cuts envisaged for public spending by any party come anywhere meeting the long-term fiscal shortfall."

The need for the extra money is caused by the demands of an ageing population, and the cost of existing cross-party pledges on cutting child poverty and tackling climate change.

The report also warns that public opinion does not seem prepared to discuss the challenges ahead. Research commissioned by Mori shows that in spite of the fiscal deficit, only 50% of the public believe that spending on public services needs to be cut. A large majority (75%) think efficiency savings can avoid the need for cuts.

The commission believes the scale of future demand, independent of the need to cut the existing £80bn structural deficit in the nation's finances, will require new ways to fund the welfare state such as co-payment, greater use of social insurance, a tax on property price gains, and increasing the full state pension age for those capable to work to 69 by 2050.

It also proposes new responsibilities on citizens to reduce the demands they make on the state. "If citizens refuse to pay more, they have to contribute more," the report says.

It also proposes the break-up of the existing Whitehall structure, and the development of more locally-run services.

The report suggests "individual eye-catching proposals to save public money do not meet the need to create a new constituency for the kind of tax changes over the long-term that will be required".

Extra spending identified by Glennerster for the next 20 years includes 1.3% of GDP on the NHS, 1% on public sector pensions, 0.5% on state pensions, 1.5% on pledges to meet child poverty, 0.5% to reduce impact of climate change and 1.7% from free personal care for the elderly.

To meet such demand would require government spending as a proportion of GDP to rise to over 45% by 2020, and nearer 47%-48% by 2030.

The commission argues that increases of that size cannot be met by traditional tax rises.

The report also accuses the Treasury of giving up any attempt to include an overall total for future demand, or any estimates for offsetting reductions in the real costs of other benefit spending, largely by allowing benefits no longer to rise in line with earnings.

It says: "The need to expose the shallowness of this debate is glaring and urgent. To cut public spending without proper debate about the long-term challenges is a recipe for future discord. To make short-term budget decisions without a clear, long-term vision for public services could be disastrous."

The report says life expectancy is rising faster than previously projected by the Treasury.

It foresees the percentage of the population over 65 rising from 16% in 2008 to 23% in 2033, and that of population aged over 85 doubling to 5%. As a result percentage of adult male time spent in retirement will rise from 18% in 1950 to well over 30%.

The report calls for greater devolution of power and local control of public services to enable prioritisation of problems to reduce inequalities.

It proposes selective introduction of co-payments or user charges, that would link contributions to service use directly and limit the risks of over-consumption.

Patrick Wintour
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



Tweetminster Livestream [ 16-Mar-10 5:16am ] [ T ]

MailOnline: The council fat cats picking up £250,000 pay-off... then landing another plum job http://bit.ly/aecbhf

HuffPolitics: RT @Public_Citizen: FDA is cautious on food safety, reckless with prescription drug safety (Dr. Sidney Wolfe on HuffPo) http://bit.ly/dxBIeB

DarrenB: preparing for several meetings that I have in London later today

MailOnline: Good news for bald men at last: Hair loss 'almost halves the risk of prostate cancer' http://bit.ly/9ZaDyd

MailOnline: Swinging Sixties girls have nothing on the Noughties: Why today's women have three times more sex than their mothers http://bit.ly/d3N4ZO

MailOnline: Families with twins more likely to split up as cost of multiple births puts a strain on parents http://bit.ly/dl4Rfk

MailOnline: Get outdoors before 9am. Have glass of red at 7pm. Small daily changes that make a difference to your wellbeing.. http://bit.ly/cNJOML

MailOnline: Eat meat to save 18,000 lives, warns government's medical chief http://bit.ly/cyyk9A

MailOnline: Dementia funding FELL the year after Labour said it was a 'priority' http://bit.ly/9c6YZc

TheEconomist: In addition to the people quoted in this report, the author is grateful to the following: Jutta... http://econ.st/cF1C0S #economist


Lancaster Unity [ 16-Mar-10 5:16am ] [ T ]

The EDL is an 'anti-Islamification' group which was formed in UK in 2009.

Regular contributors to the EDL forum have recently been BANNED for requesting action against an EDL member filmed by News of the World undercover journalists using the word "paki". Ordinarily, all EDL news (good or bad) is posted on the forum by members for open discussion. Not this time it seems.

The EDL leadership have objected not just open discussion of the video, but any discussion whatsoever. All attempts to discuss the video have been buried by Admins, anyone insisting on discussing it has been banned from the forum. Even the EDL's published 'response' to the News of the World article was cleverly absent of any mention of the video, or even a link for people to judge for themselves if the EDL member in the video was out of order.

So what has happened to free speech at the EDL? What happened to freedom of opinion on their forum? This recent attitude is somewhat ironic, from a group who staged a demo in London recently to welcome a free speech advocate, the Dutch Politician Geert Wilders.

A regular user of the forum who was banned for standing up to dictatorial admins was 'KnightofStGeorge'. He said:
'I was in the forum every day, it was a regular part of my daily routine. I lived the EDL, the group still does mean a lot to me, but there is something wrong with the leadership. I am not a racist and never have been. I am just concered about the UK being overtaken by Sharia law and being subject to islamification. I wanted the video to be discussed as something for us to be ashamed of and learn from it.

I wanted it to be an EDL training video of how NOT to conduct act [sic]. Instead I was banned. I want an apology and I want my account re-instated'
Has the glorious EDL been infiltrated by the BNP? One wonders!

Before it's news

Parties react to Bridgwater BNP announcement [ 16-Mar-10 5:16am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
The far-right British National Party is fielding its first ever candidate for the Bridgwater constituency at the forthcoming General Election.

Donna Treanor, from Scotland, said she would be campaigning on issues such as crime and the surveillance state. But after praising Bridgwater's 'rich and distinctive history' on her party's website, Dundee-born Ms Treanor, a former counsellor and auxiliary nurse, admitted she had never been to the town in an interview with the Mercury.

The 48-year-old also revealed she did not know Admiral Blake was synonymous with Bridgwater and was 'not aware' of the Sedgemoor Splash. She said: "I know about Bridgwater's churches and am interested in the Guy Fawkes celebration in November, but I have never been to the town. I will be campaigning on national and local issues, like crime and anti-social behaviour because I think it is everywhere and I don't think the police do enough."

The BNP's decision [not] to field a local candidate received a mixed response from the other parties. Labour candidate Kathy Pearce said she was 'disappointed' but called it an 'opportunity to challenge the BNP'. LibDem candidate Theo Butt Philip labelled the BNP 'appalling' but Conservative MP Ian Liddell-Grainger said their decision to stand was 'democratic'.

"If they want to put someone forward, whatever my personal belief, they can," he said.

The BNP also announced its first ever candidate for the Burnham seat, Richard Boyce.

This is the West Country


The Red Rag [ 16-Mar-10 5:16am ] [ T ]

UK finances in worse state than Greece [ 16-Mar-10 5:16am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Regulars will know that this blog is no fan of the EU but I have to admit when they are right they are right. A European Commission report due to be published on Wednesday with criticise the UK government deficit reduction plans as "Not ambitious enough".

The UK deficit already over 12.5% of GDP is expected to reach 12.6% later this year against an EU target for 2015 of just 3% . Those who have been following the Greek situation where they have been described as an economic basket case in need of a Eurozone bailout will not be pleased to hear that the UK is the only country in the EU with a higher deficit as a % of GDP.


Ten Percent [ 16-Mar-10 4:46am ] [ T ]

And Another White Terrorist [ 16-Mar-10 2:50am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
Ex Territorial Army made bombs and possessed the White Resistance Manual, A firework containing a lightbulb, a plastic shell attached to a nine volt battery, an electrified wooden clothes peg, and a tub of aluminium powder were all found when officers searched his house in April last year. A polystyrene block painted black, which was designed to [...]


Mal Burns Monitor [ 16-Mar-10 4:46am ] [ T ]

Post to Monitor 03/16/2010 (a.m.) [ 16-Mar-10 4:46am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]


Toque [ 16-Mar-10 4:16am ] [ T ]

Civic Nationalism is not "stupid" [ 16-Mar-10 1:09am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

The English Independence Party is an ethnic nationalist party set up after, or possibly during, the fall of the civic nationalist Free England Party. It joins the growing ranks* of other ethno-nationalist groups ranging from the England First Party, white nationalists; The BNP, British but in favour of an English 'Volk parliament'; United England Patriots and English Shieldwall, Anglo-Saxon revivalists, and; Steadfast and the English Lobby, both supporters of majority rights for the ethnic English.

There is overlap between these groups but ideologically speaking they are a somewhat disparate collection of ethno-nationalists. Some might be more correctly termed white-nationalists and others cultural nationalists, but even the more culturally orientated delve into areas of race. The English Lobby, for example, has recently launched a petition to "preserve the White English ethnic group identity".

The other common link that these ethnic nationalists share is a dislike, or lack of trust, for civic nationalists. So it's perhaps no surprise that new English Independence Party launched into an attack on English civic nationalism with one of the first posts to the English Independence Party blog (originally publically available but now hidden from view).

Civic English Nationalism

There's little point fisking this, it doesn't need it. But as a civic nationalist I do feel the need to reply and hopefully inject a bit of reason. I have some insight into ethnic nationalist insecurities through discussions with them on this blog when they have come to inform me that I am an idiot and to tell me that only the ethnic English can be English. Ethnic nationalists understand 'civic nationalism' to be code for multiculturalism, and they feel that a civic, plural and inclusive English national identity will render Englishness as meaningless as they feel British identity has become. I don't share that insecurity. I want people from other races, religions and cultures that make England their home to feel a sense of belonging, to feel English. In my speech to the Convention on Modern Liberty I asked the audience to ask themselves three questions:

  1. What is my ethnic identity?
  2. What is my national identity?
  3. What is my state identity, my citizenship?

Given England's constitutional status it is perfectly possible, and very probable, that second, third or fourth generation immigrants will not answer "English" to any of those three questions. That's bad for England. My civic nationalism is about allowing people who are not ethnically English to feel English by national identity, which I hope will help instill a sense of pride in England's cultural heritage and collective national identity, despite the fact - or even because of the fact - that they are not ethnically English. I want to bring us together as a nation, not by being prescriptive, but by providing a gateway into Englishness. By railing against English civic nationalism as "stupid" the ethnic nationalists are not only a reaction to the multiculturalism they despise, they are an integral part of it. We have arrived at the position whereby each and every ethnic group competes for their 'rights', the logical endpoint of multiculturalism as described by Paul Kingsnorth:

Britain now is a 'cosmopolitan' society in which no one cultural identity has pre-eminence, and in which Englishness, Polishness and Bangladeshiness must compete on equal terms. The nation's many 'minorities' are not to be integrated into mainstream society ('integrated' is such a problematic word; and anyway, what is the mainstream?) but fenced off, theoretically if not physically: defined as 'BMEs', afforded 'protection', treated as victims, spoken for. Descended from Pakistani immigrants but born in England? Sorry, you're still 'Pakistani', or 'Asian' or' 'minority ethnic'. You can be British, if you like, because Britishness has been stripped of meaning and is therefore 'inclusive' - but you can never be English (or, presumably, Scottish or Welsh, though this gets less attention) because Englishness is 'racially coded'. Attempts to define it are thus potentially racist; it's best if the English just shut up about it and get on with 'celebrating diversity' instead.

Is a more inclusive English national identity a threat to the cultural identity of the ethnic English? I don't think so. It may undermine the racial coding of Englishness, but that would be no bad thing, and those ethnic nationalists who are more interested in protecting the cultural inheritance of England should think about the positive benefits of an immigrant population who respect - respect not tolerate - the ethnic English on the basis on a mutual respect and a shared national identity.

* To the starting list you might also add The English Defence League, but their ideology is somewhat unclear.



Tweetminster Livestream [ 16-Mar-10 3:47am ] [ T ]

roversfooty: only 3 more followers to 100 please ask your followers to follow @roversfooty

roversfooty: @OurLifeNW didn't receive the Survey [ 16-Mar-10 3:20am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
roversfooty: @OurLifeNW didn't receive the Survey

BridgetFox: said goodbye to her much loved cat at 3am. RIP dear old Percy

roversfooty: @petecartwright you tweeted 10 hours ago for a Kindle book recommendation - I have just ordered The 6th Seal and there is a Kindle version

roversfooty: #ifrstmet Katie Melua at a Charity Concert in London on December 11th 2008

cnnbrk: RT @cnni U.S. envoy delays Mideast trip amid fallout over Israeli settlements. http://on.cnn.com/bII08X

roversfooty: @petecartwright The 6th Seal Kindle Book [ 16-Mar-10 3:11am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
roversfooty: @petecartwright The 6th Seal Kindle Book

roversfooty: @carilynp I have just ordered The 6th Seal - book recommendation

roversfooty: just ordered The 6th Seal book - does anyone have a book recommendation?

MailOnline: Lockerbie bomber is better than ever, brags Gaddafi's son... seven months after terrorist was given only three month... http://bit.ly/9C80Nr

PoliticsDaily: Ingrid Martin Channels Joe the Plumber, Debates Obama After Health Care Speech http://bit.ly/cPZyEd


Drive-by Times [ 16-Mar-10 3:47am ] [ T ]






Nicolas Sarkozy's UMP has taken a hit in French regional elections. In the first round the Socialists came out on top with 29.48 % of the vote, Sarkozy's Union for a Popular Movement got 26.18% and Europe Ecologie 12.7%.

The far-right Front National staged a surprising comeback, defying Sarkozy's predictions. Front National got 11.55% of the vote - a significant increase from the 6.8% it scored in last year's European elections and the 4.3% it picked up in the 2007 presidential vote.

Sarkozy has been accused of giving the anti-immigrant far-right and their sympathizers a leg-up when he launched a national identity debate. Socialist leader, Martine Aubry, said he was "re-opening the door for the Front National". She also said: "... this debate on national identity is aimed at opposing French from here with French from elsewhere or foreigners, well (in doing so) he opened a door".

The debate took place on internet forums and in public meetings. Rather than an exercise in soul-searching and enlightenment many of the exchanges descended into rants against immigration and Muslims.

In the current climate in France an anti-immigrantion stance is seen by some politicians as a way to attract votes. During the campaign the Front National put out a poster with the predictable stereotypes front and center... a woman in full Islamic veil and minarets that resembled missiles.

The poster was banned by a French court but FN leader, Jean-Marie Le Pen displayed it anyway during a TV appearance.

The results bode ill for Sarkozy. Opinion polls indicate the Socialists and their allies could win 21 mainland regions. Socialist leader Martine Aubrey said the results show that the French want to "express their wish for a more just and a stronger France".

Sarko opens the door for Le Pen [ 16-Mar-10 3:47am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]


BBC News | Politics | UK Edition [ 16-Mar-10 3:46am ] [ T ]

Council chief pay-offs criticised [ 16-Mar-10 3:20am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
The average pay-off for council chief executives who leave their jobs is £256,104, a local government spending watchdog says.


Beau Bo D'Or [ 16-Mar-10 3:16am ] [ T ]



Tweetminster Livestream [ 16-Mar-10 2:16am ] [ T ]

TheFix: Prez O sits down with @jaketapper to talk (what else?) health care: http://ow.ly/1loFr

bbcpolitics: Government plans to cut the UK's budget deficit are not ambitious enough, a European Commission report will.. http://bit.ly/bdcKVN

bbcpolitics: The number of ministers should be cut by up to a third to reduce costs and make Parliament more independent.. http://bit.ly/cQ9BE3

bbcpolitics: Almost a third of council chief executives who leave their jobs are paid off, the local government spending.. http://bit.ly/abRnXM

bbcpolitics: The vice-president of Kraft Foods will be questioned by MPs over his company's takeover of Cadbury later. http://bit.ly/cPqwwn

gideonrachman: Bubble or not, China's rise is real http://bit.ly/bHDm91

TheFix: 9:36 pm -- Meg Whitman campaign declares "enormous" victory in debate. 9:38 pm -- Steve Poizner proclaims debate victory. Ah, politics.

PoliticsDaily: Huge Student Loan Overhaul Tacked Onto Health Care Reform http://bit.ly/aPsXNL

TheEconomist: In America, the number of people employed outside agriculture fell slightly, by 36,000 during the month... http://econ.st/bs1BTr #economist

The_Spectator: Live: Bush, Cheney, Blair, Brown: Four Characters in Search of a Tragedian?: I enjoyed Ross Douthat's column this ... http://bit.ly/cyfmgi

SpectatorLive: Bush, Cheney, Blair, Brown: Four Characters in Search of a Tragedian?: I enjoyed Ross Douthat's column this week in w... http://kl.am/8LBi

stuartbonar: @BridgetFox Best wishes to Percy :-) [ 16-Mar-10 1:20am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
stuartbonar: @BridgetFox Best wishes to Percy :-)

BridgetFox: is sitting up with a very poorly Percy cat. Not good. Poor old fellow....

stuartbonar: RT @sarabedford Am sitting on the floor of a hospital corridor reading Andrew Rawnsley's The End of the Party. The irony is not lost on me.

TheFix: St. Pete Times calls Marco Rubio "freewheeling big spender of special interest cash". Ouchy. http://ow.ly/1lnOL

ChukaUmunna: @barrygardiner Many thanks Barry! Much appreciated.

stuartbonar: @sarabedford I suspect you missed an ironic #changewesee off that last tweet.

stephen_gilbert: RT: YouGov tracker: Con 37% (nc), Lab 32% (-1), LD 21% (+4) #fb

RichardvReeves: RT @guardiannews: High cost deters social services from applying to take children into care http://bit.ly/dd5Dsi

AndrewSkudder: New album from Dan Le Sac vs Scroobius Pip http://tr.im/S1mn About time too!


BBC News | Politics | UK Edition [ 16-Mar-10 2:16am ] [ T ]

EU urges faster cut of UK deficit [ 16-Mar-10 1:15am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
Government plans to cut the UK's budget deficit are not ambitious enough, a European Commission report will warn this week.

Concern at council chief pay-offs [ 16-Mar-10 12:02am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
Almost a third of council chief executives who leave their jobs are paid off, the local government spending watchdog says.

Cut ministers by a third, say MPs [ 16-Mar-10 12:08am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
The number of ministers should be cut by up to a third to reduce costs and make Parliament more independent, MPs say.

Kraft to face MPs over takeover [ 16-Mar-10 12:02am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
The vice-president of Kraft Foods will be questioned by MPs over his company's takeover of Cadbury later.


Tony Blair [ 16-Mar-10 2:16am ] [ T ]

Does America want "regime change" in Netanyahu's Israel? [ 16-Mar-10 12:29am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]
Does America want "regime change" in Netanyahu's Israel?



In praise of ... | A bar of soap | Editorial [ 16-Mar-10 1:02am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

The perfumed tablet's displacement from the RPI by the dribbling liquid dispenser won't wash if we want clean governance

A harsh blow to the reputation of one of civilisation's humblest boons was delivered yesterday by the Office for National Statistics. They have extracted the bar of soap from the basket of goods used to calculate the Consumer Prices Index and Retail Prices Index. It was done, of course, with the best of intentions - to more accurately chart changing consumer behaviour. Garlic bread is in and pitta out; hair straighteners are 2010 and hairdryers so 2009; throw your DVDs in the bin, unless of course you have a Blu-ray player. This is not the first time that soap has fallen foul of the government. The manufacture of soap became so lucrative in the 17th century, that it was a right only granted to tax-paying monopolies. By 1636 the star chamber issued a decree forbidding soap manufacture outside a one-mile limit of London and Bristol. Long into the next two centuries, soap pans were fitted with padlocks, the key to which was held by the taxman. Today, we are told the bar of soap is slipping from grace to be replaced by the liquid soap dispenser. These dribbling spouts, which spew soap in every direction save the intended one, are to personal hygiene what 4x4 are to good neighbourliness. They only add to the mountains of landfill, because inevitably they rarely last multiple refills. They complicate a simple task and need themselves to be regularly scrubbed. The tablet of soap perfumes all around it and when its job is done, disappears leaving not a rack behind.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Rape responses | A case for conviction | Editorial [ 16-Mar-10 12:53am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Even if one woman in 24 will be raped at some point, Baroness Stern's review offers no easy solutions; not because she is a wimp, but because there is no magic wand

Around 120,000 rapes take place each year in England and Wales. One woman in 24 will be raped in her lifetime. These are shocking figures. Yet the number of rapes that end in convictions is pitifully small. Only 2,000 men, some of them multiple offenders, were convicted of rape last year. Quite rightly, this disproportion between commission and conviction provokes huge concern. Yet neither the public's strongly held views nor the strenuous efforts of policymakers over more than 30 years have yet managed to convert public outrage into sufficiently effective solutions. In many eyes, rape remains the embodiment of a crime for which the victim always suffers while the offender goes free.

Baroness Stern's review of the response of public authorities to rape complaints offers no easy solution to these problems. This is not because Baroness Stern is a wimp. It is because there is no magic wand that can wave away some of the inherent difficulties in rape and rape law. Rape cases hinge on the ability to prove the lack of consent to an activity which in other circumstances is entirely lawful. Consent and the denial of consent each cover many moods. There is sometimes a direct conflict of evidence that is hard to resolve. Short of allowing Stern to reverse the burden of proof in rape cases - an option which was outside her terms of reference and which would in any case be fundamentally unjust - it is hard to see how the disparity between reported rapes and rape convictions could in fact be changed quickly.

Yet the law is not the only way of addressing the issues and the baroness has not shrugged her shoulders in the face of the legal problems. She thinks there is much in the heightened modern response to rape, especially in police support for victims, that is getting better and can be built upon further. That is undoubtedly true and deserves recognition. She wants the health service to take over the forensic medical provision for rape victims. She wants prosecutors to have greater personal responsibility for individual cases. And she wants rape victims to get full compensation even if they were under the influence of drink or drugs. Stern is right to argue that such joined-up measures can promote an atmosphere which continues to take rape seriously and simultaneously encourages victims to pursue their cases.

Baroness Stern is also right that conviction rates are not the be all and end all of an effective rape strategy. But this is not a zero-sum game. This country would certainly benefit from the more rounded approach to rape response that her report advocates. Yet the scale of rape and sexual assault in our society is appalling. People are right to be indignant that so few rapists still answer for their crimes.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The AA and RAC are urging the chancellor to postpone a planned 3p hike in petrol duty, due on 1 April

Motorists should brace for record high petrol prices this year as the cost of unleaded fuel surges to £1.20 a litre or more, according to research by the AA.

In a stark warning to consumers, the organisation says those struggling on tight budgets would be hard hit by the predicted price hike and has urged the chancellor, Alistair Darling, to postpone the introduction of a planned 3p hike in petrol duty, due on 1 April.

The average petrol price is currently just over £1.15 a litre, but the AA says pump prices could nudge £1.20 by next month - equivalent to over £5.40 a gallon - when the petrol levy is due to start.

Figures show the average petrol bill for a two-car family has already soared by £52 a month in the past year, to £245.

The AA's president, Edmund King, said: "The UK is barely out of recession, yet petrol threatens to rise to record prices seen during the boom of 2008, shortly before the collapse into recession.

"If families, drivers on fixed incomes and those on low pay were unable to cope with prices then, they are even less likely now." King attributed the increase to rises in the price of wholesale petrol since January.

Surging petrol prices will also hit supermarkets which have recently absorbed some of the cost of pump increases.

The RAC has joined calls for the government to hold back new fuel duty charges, saying petrol prices were well below the £1 a litre mark when the levy was announced in last year's budget.

Lindsay Hoyle, Labour MP on the Commons business select committee, called the increase a "complete disgrace".

Speaking to the Daily Telegraph, he said: "Yes, crude oil has gone up this year, but nothing like the rise in petrol prices. Motorists are being legally mugged at the forecourt by petrol companies."

Aidan Jones
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Cuardian/ICM survey | Unpopularity poll | Editorial [ 16-Mar-10 12:32am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Labour looks a party trundling towards defeat, yet suggesting the Conservatives are the solution runs into hostility; and so opportunity knocks for the Liberal Democrats

Labour ministers speak these days of getting out of bed with a spring in their step. Amid Conservative stumbles and signs that their own party is no longer quite as detested as it once was, they report the unfamiliar tickle of a gust in their sails. Momentum may indeed have shifted somewhat, and yet the single salient fact about today's Guardian/ICM poll is that - a few weeks before a general election - Labour remains behind, just as it has been in every one of the last 319 polls published by any company. Meanwhile Gordon Brown who - unwittingly or not - yesterday left Woman's Hour listeners thinking that he would respond to defeat by clinging on as leader of his party, still drains Labour's standing with a public that overwhelmingly feels that it is time for a change.

By any ordinary standards Labour would be judged a party trundling towards defeat, and yet it would be wrong to dismiss its rising spirits as the pure product of delusion. For while the country seems agreed that change would be a good thing, there is no such agreement on what form it should take, and suggestions that the Conservatives are the solution run into outright hostility. In the past few days, a former leader of the Conservative MEPs stirred old fears about the nasty party by defecting to the Liberal Democrats over David Cameron's entanglements with rightwing eastern Europeans, and Tory talk about restoring tax breaks for second-home owners pointed to continuing differences between the priorities of central office and Acacia Avenue. While Mr Cameron will be cheered to be (just) back at the 40% threshold, which gives him a decent chance of a working majority, he should be chilled that only 29% of voters actually want him to get one.

The greatest of all Conservative vulnerabilities are to be found on the economic terrain where the election's decisive battles may be fought. After months of public floundering about whether expenditure cuts were required at all, the government has deftly reframed the argument as one about timing - immediate blood, sweat and tears under the Tories, as against Labour's promise of pain postponed. Besides the (serious) case for proceeding with caution until the recovery firms up, electors preoccupied with muddling through the here and now are perhaps bound to warm to the argument that belt-tightening can be put off to another day, and our poll shows a generally unpopular administration is narrowly prevailing on this point. More people suspect the Conservatives than Labour of planning to raise taxes, which is probably wide of the mark, and is one more sign that tough Tory talk about the cupboard being bare may have hit home rather too far for the party's own good.

Popular misgivings about Mr Cameron unleashing a new age of austerity are real but not necessarily something that an unpopular government will be able to exploit, and so opportunity knocks for the Liberal Democrats. Today's poll confirms Nick Clegg remains little-known, but his party stands at a respectable 20%, and in the planned leaders' debate he will stand shoulder-to-shoulder alongside Messrs Cameron and Brown, providing the third force with a spotlight it has never enjoyed before. Mr Clegg may, however, find he squirms in its glare - his recent message has meandered from low taxes and Margaret Thatcher in the Conservative press, to a stress on political reform and the environment in the pages of publications found on the other side of the aisle.

No party enjoys total command in the face of the challenges confronting the country, and - although a bankrupt electoral system may yet give one of them untrammelled power - it is telling that many more voters would prefer a hung parliament to either strain of majority rule. England does not love coalitions, Disraeli said. That may be so, but our poll suggests that the country dislikes over-mighty political parties even more intensely.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Hugh Muir's Diary [ 16-Mar-10 12:15am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Nice NGO you have there, say the civil servants. Shame if anything happened to it

o There has been no ban on the use of the word "purdah", says the Cabinet Office, taking issue with our claim that it has been officially frowned upon to avoid giving offence to minorities. (The actual meaning of the word is "a curtain or screen to keep women separate from men or strangers".) No prohibition, they say, and we must believe them. Never mind the siren voices from Whitehall who tell us that using the term these days would be akin to flying their careers straight into a mountain. Clearly a misunderstanding. We accept that. But it is understandable because there have been some funny things going on. Not least the fact that a number of non-governmental organisations benefiting from funding by Whitehall tell us they have been hauled in and warned that they had better recognise the purdah period by making sure they don't release any reports or say anything that might cause trouble for the government. If you find the hospitals are dirty or the cells are full, shut up about it for a while. If asylum seekers are being force fed Mars bars, keep it quiet. Nothing has been written down. Just chats, you understand. But if Britain suddenly seems less broken for a while, you'll know why.

o And it certainly feels broken in Kent where Graham Rumsey, the Tory councillor we highlighted a fortnight ago over his achievement in being jailed for failure to pay council tax, has had the wrecking ball out again. This time he has been given an additional prison sentence for failing to control his dangerous dog, which attacked two teenagers on local playing fields last September: 42 days to run concurrent with the 60 days for not paying his tax. Eventually, we are told, he will cease to be a public representative. And eventually, he will cease to enjoy the backing of the party. But that's for later. For now, he merely symbolises the work there is to do.

o And it starts with the drive against alcoholism. With that in mind, the royals are doing their bit to dissociate themselves from the evils of drinking. Wells & Young's in Bedford has a successful bottled beer called Young's Kew Gold, so called because some of the hops used in the brew were developed at the Royal Botanic Gardens. Traditionally, a consideration was paid to Kew to help with further research. But now the tremulous royal gardeners have apparently decided they no longer wish to be associated with an alcoholic beverage so the beer will soon reappear as Young's London Gold. The royals know exactly what happens outside the Locarno on a Saturday night. They want no part of it.

o Not for them a trip to Wandsworth at the weekend when the young Tories of Conservative Future plan what they describe on Facebook as "a day of campaigning and drinking (not necessarily in that order!)". Drinks are free after 4pm and those who have been before, if they remember anything, will recall "what a legendary session this tends to turn into". Believers in the new sobriety will give the area a miss.

o Damn this downturn, part 307. "At one time I had 38 classic saxophones but it's down to 15 now - there is a recession, after all," explains British jazz star Courtney Pine. Rich or poor. Black or white. All are suffering. Everybody hurts.

o And finally, can this reply from the UK Border Agency, currently being pored over by immigration solicitors on their restricted-access website, be genuine? "You claim that you could not relocate to the area where your parents are living as you fear attacks from guerrillas. However, information from the World Wide Fund for Nature confirms that guerrillas [sic] are not native to that part of the country and in any event there are few recorded incidents of primates attacking humans unless their natural habitat is disturbed or their young threatened". Frightening if it is.

Hugh Muir
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Leaked report reveals European doubts over Britain's finances and questions 'ambition' of Labour's plans to cut debt

Labour's strategy for controlling Britain's spending was tonight under fresh challenge when it emerged that the European commission is preparing to demand tougher government action to rein in the UK's record peacetime deficit. In findings which were seized upon by the Conservatives, Brussels warned that the current plans for repairing the black hole in the budget left by a deep and long recession needed to be more ambitious.

"A credible time frame for restoring public finances to a sustainable position requires additional fiscal tightening measures beyond those currently planned," said a draft report, due to be approved by the commission , but leaked to the news agency Reuters. It added: "The overall conclusion is that the fiscal strategy in the convergence programme is not sufficiently ambitious and needs to be significantly reinforced."

The findings are likely to stoke what has become the pivotal political row between the two main parties ahead of next week's budget, and the general election campaign that will follow.

They will add to pressure on the prime minister at a time when Labour's new-year resurgence appears to have stalled. An ICM poll for the Guardian tomorrow shows the gap between the parties has increased, to a nine-point Conservative lead over Labour. It also suggests that Brown's personal unpopularity with the electorate remains a drag on the party's standing, even though the Tories have been beset by their own problems in recent weeks.

The European commission is set to warn that on current plans the UK will not meet the 2014-15 deadline for reducing the budget deficit to below 3% of national output. Chancellor Alistair Darling's proposals envisage the gap between spending and taxes being reduced to 4.7% of gross domestic product, but the commission said even this target might be missed as a result of weaker growth than the Treasury is expecting.

The assessment provided some support for Darling ahead of next week's budget, when it said the plans for the coming fiscal year were adequate, but the findings will increase speculation in the markets that the election will be quickly followed by fresh measures to cut spending and raise taxes, whatever the result.

The shadow chancellor, George Osborne, claimed the report was a heavy blow for the prime minister. "The Conservatives have been arguing that we need to reduce our record budget deficit more quickly to support the recovery. Our argument is backed by credit rating agencies, business leaders, international investors and now the European commission. That is why we need a change of government to restore confidence in our economy at home and abroad."

A Treasury spokesman said the government was committed to halving the deficit over four years and that such a cut would be the sharpest among the Group of Seven industrialised countries. "The chancellor has taken a judgment on the appropriate pace of adjustment in 2010-11 and beyond," the spokesman said.

This takes into account "the uncertainty around prospects for the public finances given the exceptional nature and strength of the global downturn, the need to support the economy through the early stages of the recovery, and the need to deliver sustainable public finances," he said.

While tomorrow's poll will be dispiriting for Labour, it is also clear that voters are not convinced by the Conservatives.

The survey shows only 18% think Britain would be best served by a strong Labour win. And though almost a third think a clear Conservative victory would be best, 44% want a hung parliament in which the government works with smaller parties such as the Liberal Democrats.

The Tory leader is 11 points ahead of Gordon Brown as the man voters want to win, and 20 points ahead as the leader best campaigning for "the votes of people like you". He has a 14-point lead as the most competent for prime minister, and an 11-point lead as the man most likely to lead Britain in the right direction.

The figures call into question recent excitement about a Labour fightback. The Tories, at 40%, are up three on the February Guardian poll, and up two on another more recent ICM poll last weekend. The Liberal Democrats are on 20%, unchanged since the last Guardian/ICM poll, while support for other parties is on 9%. Conservative support has been within three points of 40% in all ICM polls since October.

Brown is likely to try to stay on even if he loses power, but a close result could mean there might have to be another election this year. Questioned on BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, Brown said: "I will keep going. I will keep going because I want a majority."

Asked whether he owed it to the Labour party to stand aside if he did not secure a majority, he said: "I think I owe it to people to continue and complete the work we've started of taking this country out of the most difficult global financial recession."

ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,002 adults by telephone on 12-14 March 2010. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.

Larry Elliott
Patrick Wintour
Julian Glover
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Letters: Beef up our approach to food [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

You performed the worthy task of providing exposure to the labour conditions associated with the UK meat industry (Violence and abuse rife in food factories, 13 March). Indeed the EHRC investigation adds to the social science evidence base that has already argued that exploited people in this sector are "treated as animals". Yet your coverage fails to note the interwoven exploitation of animals and the pressing need to curtail the meat industry precisely because of its inequitable impact on exploited humans - not just in terms of labour conditions but also because of the relation between meat consumption with both impaired public health and anticipated contributions to climate change.

Dr Richard Twine

Lancaster

o Isn't it time we reconnected with how our food is provided (Perfect storm has led to a race to the bottom, 13 March)? The storm has been gathering for decades. At its core are corporate greed, long and unaccountable supply chains and perverse agricultural subsidies. It's not just workers who suffer - a race to the bottom means our food system is dependent on underpriced fossil fuels, does not recognise the limitations of water and land resources, and supports unhealthy diets. We will only be able to address these challenges successfully with a completely different approach to food and agriculture policies and practices. With the upcoming reform of the European common agricultural policy, we have a unique opportunity to do this. That is why today we are joining with hundreds of other organisations in launching a European Food Declaration (www.europeanfooddeclaration.org). The declaration outlines principles for a radically new common agriculture and food policy that is fair, inclusive, transparent, sustainable and, importantly, has the interests of people rather than corporations at its centre. This is the time to reconnect people and their food and do away with practices that abuse people, livestock and the environment.

Patrick Mulvany

UK Platform for Food Sovereignty

Kirtana Chandrasekaran

Friends of the Earth

o Ideally, legislation should ensure that these things do not happen in our society. Given that it is unlikely those laws will be made or enforced, should there a pragmatic solution, along the lines of Fairtrade or Freedom Foods, so that consumers can vote with their purses for decent conditions for the people employed in the food industry?

Vicky Brown

Truro, Cornwall

o The degrading working conditions that employees are subject to in many of Britain's food factories are a direct legacy of Margaret Thatcher's crusade against trade union organisation in pursuit of a deregulated labour market. The Liberal Democrat leader's support for this brave new world and his muscular redbaiting ("bankers are Scargills in pinstripes"), together with New Labour's ambivalence to working-class self-organisation give some clue to the feelings of abandonment driving sections of the white working class into the arms of the BNP. Women with heavy periods and people with bladder problems on production lines forced to endure the humiliation of bleeding and urinating on themselves need trade union organisation. They don't need Nick Clegg.

Mike French

Wolverhampton

o Sadly the abuse of meat plant workers does not stop at staff employed by the abattoirs. The job of independent meat inspectors is to make sure the UK's meat is safe. However, if they try to stop production to inspect a suspect carcass, they report being bullied and intimidated as a means of making contaminated meat pass by. They receive little or no support from the Food Standards Agency, their employer, when they raise this issue. Hundreds of redundancies, made to cut costs, mean there are now too few meat inspectors to do the job.

The FSA need to take action to support meat inspectors, and protect the UK consumer. It should not wait for a meat safety tragedy to hit the headlines before the concerns of meat inspectors are taken seriously.

Dave Prentis

General secretary, Unison

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Cut number of ministerial roles by a third, says MPs' report [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Too many junior minister jobs given out as a 'political reward', says public administration select committee report

A third of ministerial posts should be scrapped to slim down the government and prevent junior ministers clogging up parliament with extra legislation, a committee of MPs argues today.

The government has 119 ministers - a figure that exceeds the Indian government's total of 78 to run a country of more than 1 billion. Too many ministerial roles in the UK are given as a "political reward" instead of out of necessity, the public administration select committee report concludes.

While the number of cabinet ministers has remained stable for more than 100 years, the number of unpaid junior ministers has risen sharply. That upward trend is "striking and hard to justify", says the report. "We were told that an over-abundance of ministers can 'clog' the decision-making process, blurring lines of responsibility and diverting resources," it adds.

Successive prime ministers have appointed additional ministers by creating unpaid posts, which are not subject to the caps on remunerated positions. The report suggests new legislation should be created to limit ministerial posts and cut the number of position by a third.

"Ministers' role is to take key decisions, account to parliament for them and conduct discussions at the highest level," says the report. "Some junior ministerial roles appear to fall far short of this. Civil servants should not be put in the position of 'making work' for ministers. Not only is this costly and inefficient but it devalues the role of ministers."

Lord Turnbull, the former cabinet secretary, told the committee that unpaid ministers could cost the public purse more than £500,000 in wages for private secretaries, press officers and drivers.

The report says ministerial positions could be a way of "exercising political control". MPs are being given "special envoy" roles for the prime minister or advising on particular issues or appointed parliamentary private secretaries by ministers. "The suspicion is that these are a way of extending patronage," it says.

Jonathan Powell, Tony Blair's former chief of staff, told the committee: "It is a way of making sure you have that many votes in the Commons ... if the prime minister had his way, he would appoint every single backbencher in his party to a ministerial job to ensure their vote."

Tony Wright, the Labour chair of the committee, said: "The number of ministers has been growing ever since the 1950s, driven in part by the desire of prime ministers to hand out patronage positions and secure votes. Some junior ministers do important and difficult jobs. However, there are too many and it is absurd that civil servants should be having to make work for those who are underemployed."

Francis Maude, the shadow cabinet office minister, said: "A Conservative administration would reduce the size of the Commons by 10%, cut ministerial salaries by 5% and reduce the use of ministerial cars by a third."

Polly Curtis
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


The UK parties want to slash Scotland's budget. We will send them a strong message

Martin Kettle should have exercised caution before basing a very specific conclusion on the back of one opinion poll (If the polls are right, then Salmond's party is over, 26 February).

He suggested that a survey taken at the end of a particularly dire week for Scottish politics was evidence that the SNP's popularity was in decline: "It showed that Labour is now better placed north of the border on UK general election voting intentions than it was in 2005," and "[put] Labour ahead on Holyrood polling for the first time since Alex Salmond became Scotland's first minister." Unfortunately for Kettle, a week really is a long time in politics.

The poll on which the article was based was taken in the midst of a barrage of negative opposition attacks and orchestrated complaints to the Scottish parliamentary standards commissioner. "There is no disguising that the shine is coming off the SNP," Kettle claimed. Despite the best attempts of the opposition to tarnish senior figures in the SNP, this simply wasn't so.

Just seven days later, and not only had these complaints been thrown out by the standards commissioner, but deputy first minister Nicola Sturgeon had resolved all opposition criticism over her handling of a constituency issue with an impressive performance in the Scottish parliament.

We proceeded with our own agenda to make Scotland fairer and more prosperous, and an Ipsos Mori poll published two days after Kettle's article showed the SNP seven points ahead of Labour in Scottish parliament voting intentions, and just two points behind for the general election.

Kettle is right to suggest that at Westminster "the party battle is now moving into hung parliament territory". This is a situation redolent with opportunity. The SNP is not in this election to win the keys to Downing Street: we're working hard to send a strong block of MPs to Westminster to champion Scotland's interests. Working with our Plaid Cymru partners, we can secure vital gains for Scotland regardless of whether the next UK government is Labour or Tory.

To take just one Scottish priority, we can free Scotland's £200m fossil fuel levy from the grip of Treasury control, to invest in boosting renewable energy projects.

Kettle claims that the default position of SNP strategists is to "blame everything on London". At this election, we're not blaming London - the SNP is getting behind communities across Scotland who've had enough of the establishment politics of Westminster.

Kettle suggests that the SNP Scottish government will face difficulties in delivering on our measures to make Scotland a fairer, healthier society. "There isn't the money to pay for it all," he states. He's quite right - but this isn't the fault of SNP ministers. It's the UK Labour government who want to slash Scotland's budget by £814m in the next two years - and the other UK parties agree with them. Only the SNP will stand up for Scotland. The fight has just begun.

Angus Robertson
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


A snapshot of history [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Fred Jarvis's 10th exhibition captures the best of his photos over half a century, from school pupils to Labour politicians

He has been dubbed "the Labour movement's very own paparazzo" by Tony Blair and his work once prompted Peter Mandelson to put pen to paper to praise him as "a great photographer".

As a former general secretary of the National Union of Teachers and president of the Trades Union Congress, Fred Jarvis is best known for his working life in trade unionism, education and political activism, but over the years his enthusiasm as a keen amateur photographer has also attracted recognition.

Later this month Jarvis's 10th photographic exhibition goes on display in central London. It represents the best of his work over the last 50-odd years, reflecting his interests and passions for education and politics, not forgetting his beloved Hammers (West Ham football club).

In total, 150 images will appear, including signed photographs of the six successive Labour education secretaries since the party was elected to government in 1997. Some will be auctioned on the opening night of the exhibition, and offers will be invited for others in a fundraising drive for the north London hospice where his late wife, Anne, a teacher and Labour party activist, died three years ago.

Jarvis first started taking photos in 1947 when he won a Voigtlander camera in a Naafi raffle while serving in the army in Germany. Since then, he has captured the rallies, demonstrations and marches that were integral to his life as a student (president of the National Union of Students) and teachers' leader. As an official and then general secretary of the largest teachers' union, the NUT, schools have been a source of inspiration.

"The lovely thing about photographing children in schools - and in particular younger ones in primary schools - is that they are so absorbed in their work," Jarvis says. "And I have always enjoyed the colour and vibrancy of primary schools, with all the work displayed on the walls." He admits he has been fortunate to have visited so many schools, camera in hand: "It dispels the myth that there is anything like a 'one-size-fits-all' comprehensive," he says. " To label them all the same is an insult to the schools and to their communities. You walk in the door and instantly get a sense of their ethos, character and history."

Also in the exhibition are numerous shots of the Labour election campaign machine at work in its Millbank headquarters in the run-up to the 1997 election, along with celebratory scenes of the victory party at the Festival Hall. "I was lucky that [then Labour party general secretary] Tom Sawyer gave me a free run," Jarvis grins.

On the day that we meet in his London home, he shows me a colour picture of five Labour leaders in one room, taken in February 2000. Alongside a fresh-faced young Tony Blair are James Callaghan, Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock and Margaret Beckett (briefly leader following the sudden death of John Smith). In a twist of fate, I learn after leaving of Foot's death that same day, at the age of 96.

o Pictures for a Hospice, 22-26 March 2010 at the TUC Centre. www.congresscentre.co.uk

Rebecca Smithers
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Letters: Social enterprises in the public services [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

The "John Lewis model" has been cited as a way of increasing staff involvement and motivation by giving them direct ownership of the service. However, as your editorial (12 March) rightly asks, is this the ideal model for the NHS, if it means that money leaves the public purse in the form of bonuses to employees?

But there are thousands of social enterprises delivering public services in a way that not only empowers staff through ownership, but keeps money within the system. Social enterprises are businesses run primarily for social and environmental objectives. They are often employee-owned but, unlike John Lewis, they do not opt for employee share-ownership giving staff a financial stake in the business. Many social enterprises might have bonus schemes or choose to spend more of their money on staff development, but money is never their primary motivation.

Central Surrey Health is owned and run by its nursing team and has been able to make decisions based on experience and the needs of customers, rather than the directives of a top-down bureaucracy. Its ownership structure is not about profit, but about giving control to frontline professionals - and this extends to decisions on how to reinvest any profit to improve services. At CSH this has resulted in a doubling of spending on staff training and development.

Sandwell Community Caring Trust invests in its staff because it wants a satisfied workforce. It was ranked 11th in the Sunday Times list of the Best 100 Companies to Work For. The number one medium-size business was another social enterprise, P3, which works in mental health. Social enterprises can play a key part in creating better public services.

Peter Holbrook

CEO, Social Enterprise Coalition

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Universal system paid for by taxation would disproportionately benefit the very wealthy, thinktank warns

The government has been told not to consider setting up a tax funded universal personal care service for older people, because it would disproportionately benefit the very wealthy.

The King's Fund thinktank has waded into the minefield which has seen angry exchanges between all three parties, by arguing for a "partnership" where the Treasury funds half of old age care costs, and the remaining bill is paid for by "a £1 matching government contribution for every £2 individuals pay themselves".

The system would also have a safety net for the poor. It would not be cheap, and is projected to cost the government £10.1bn in 2015, rising to £15.5bn by 2026 - 90% more than the existing system would cost in 2015. But it would benefit people with modest means, the fund said, "as they would no longer face the 'cliff-edge' of the current means-tested system if they have savings or assets of £23,000 or more".

Since 1997 adult social care has enjoyed a 53% real-terms increase in resources, yet the impact of demographic and funding pressures has meant an ever tighter rationing of services, with the "safety net of public support cast even higher".

Richard Humphries, the lead author of a King's Fund report, Securing Good Care for More People, published today, said that the existing system was a bargain-basement version of care which had seen councils contain demand by restricting access. By 2006, fewer households were receiving supported home care than in 1997, and fewer older people got publicly funded care at home than did in 2003. Three-quarters of councils now treat old people only if they have "substantial or critical" needs. "We have means-tested the soul out of the system," said Humphries. "The debate has become about the 45,000 people forced to sell their homes to get care, but there are 1.8 million people who use adult social services."

The report says that Britain is now the only rich country to "restrict access to publicly funded social care only to poorer people"; reforms in Austria, Germany and Japan have widened access to their provision. However, Humphries said it would be wrong to assume that this meant Britain needed universal free care funded out of taxation. This, the report says, would "disproportionately benefit wealthier people at the point of need". The question was a political and moral one, he argued. "Why should a cleaner on £8,000 a year pay taxes to fund the care of a person who lives in a £400,000 property that will be left to their children but does not have to find a penny?"

The fund says individuals should contribute to cost of care in old age, as there is a "growing awareness" of the affluence of the newly retiring baby-boomer generation who will control £2tr in housing wealth by 2026; otherwise we would have "by far the richest cohort in history becoming the first to receive universal free care ... paid for, to a significant extent, by the most indebted cohort in modern times".

Randeep Ramesh
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Letters: A decision that Nick Clegg can't shy away from [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

Jackie Ashley is right (The obsession with swing voters is strangling politics, 15 March). A fairer voting system is crucial to reconnecting the people with politics. However, for this election, it is in the fight for the marginals that the chance for such change lies. Let's be clear what will happen if the Tories win. Not only will public services be cut to the quick, they are also likely to cut the number of MPs by around 100 - most of which will be Labour. A poll for Compass shows that if the Conservatives are elected then the number intending to vote for Scottish independence in a referendum will rise by a third, making it highly likely that in the subsequent parliament Labour could lose its Scottish MPs. Finally, it is expected that the Tories will introduce legislation cutting large-scale union funding.

This, plus the fact that electoral reform will disappear off the political map, could result in Labour and the Lib Dems being reduced to permanent and impoverished rumps in a parliament where, without Scotland, the Tories have a permanent majority. This leaves Labour voters in Lib Dem marginals and Lib Dem voters in Labour marginals with no choice. They must hold their nose and cast their votes informed by the battle cry "ABC": Anything But Cameron.

Colin Hines

East Twickenham, Middlesex

o Nick Clegg's claim that "the party with the strongest mandate from the voters will have the moral authority to be the first to seek to govern" (Kingmaker role is not what I seek, 15 March) seems to me to be an excuse to avoid making the biggest political decision of his career. The question Clegg needs to ask is whether or not his party is a centre-left party. If so, there is nothing morally culpable about forming a majority coalition with Labour, even if the Conservatives win the most seats, for the majority of the public will have voted in favour of a centre-left administration. The Liberal party of the 19th-century was formed of far more disparate elements than would be found within a Labour-Lib Dem administration. This is not a decision Clegg can shy away from.

Jeremy Wikeley 

Romsey, Hampshire

o However uninspiring the alternative may seem, a new governing party would grow into the job. Floating voters considering voting Labour or Lib Dem should be concerned that a Labour win would lead to 18 years' continuous tenure by Gordon Brown at 11 and 10 Downing Street. Such a long uninterrupted dominance of the top two cabinet positions would be unhealthy for our democracy and was not achieved by Thatcher, Churchill, Lloyd George, Salisbury, Palmerston, or even Gladstone, but only by Pitt the Younger and Walpole in the 18th century's very limited franchise. It would also emphasise the paucity of Labour talent since John Smith's death. 

John Birkett

St Andrews, Fife

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Letters: Unity cracks over BA cabin crew strike [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

The unelected Andrew Adonis condemns the Unite trade union for a strike decision by secret ballot that met all the legislative hurdles imposed by Margaret Thatcher and her anti-union government (Brown wades into BA strike, 15 March). British Airways cabin crew twice voted for industrial action by an overwhelming majority in defence of their working conditions. The decision to strike was not made by the union hierarchy, but by individual working people with mortgages to pay and wages to lose. People do not put their livelihoods at risk without a very good reason. Of course strikes which affect the public are never likely to be popular, but to deny workers the right to strike is to put every worker at the mercy of their sometimes awful employers without any redress.

Barry Leathwood

Bridgwater, Somerset

o Gordon Brown believes BA cabin crew's strike is unjustified and deplorable. Presumably he believes it's perfectly acceptable for managers to tear up agreements, bully staff and throw people out of their jobs in the middle of an economic crisis, created in no small part by Mr Brown's love affair with the City.

Tom Wall

London

o I hope that John Davies (Letters, 12 March) can convince the disabled, elderly, sick and children that "strikes can be good". Strikes are a primitive 19th-century method of dealing with industrial disputes by using innocent members of the public as a tool in negotiations, rather like the Somali pirates. It is surely time we evolved a more mature method of resolving such matters.

Dr Anthony Field

London

o Andrew Adonis states the reputation of BA is at stake. Well, as one who has travelled to over 60 countries in the last 15 years, mainly on BA in coach, I must say they are already the worst airline imaginable. You are treated as cattle; the staff are rude. Why? Not because they are nasty people, but that they work for a sub-standard airline.

Rev Dr James Milton Rosenthal

St Nicholas Society

o The new BBC series Inside John Lewis suggests a solution. Good staff relations are vital for BA: no pilots, no cabin staff - no flights and no income. Isn't the best solution for BA to convert into a staff partnership, on the lines of John Lewis? It would have every incentive to promote the best interests of BA. QED.

Dr Brian Parsons

Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire

o 14 March: Adonis condemns BA crew's struggle to protect their livelihoods.

15 March: Brown condemns BA crews.

6 May: Labour's lack of support for trade unionists is reciprocated in full.

James Folan

South Wingfield, Derbyshire

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


David Cameron: the verdict from Wiltshire [ 16-Mar-10 12:05am ] [ T ] [ G ] [ N ] [ L ]

David Cameron's interview with Trevor McDonald was much-hyped - but how did it play with ordinary voters far from the Westminster circus?

'I used to watch Bonanza and The High Chaparral" . . . "Does Brokeback Mountain count?" Samantha Cameron has just mentioned that, like any ordinary chap, her Dave is a fan of cowboy films, and this ad hoc group of "ordinary" viewers - far from the Westminster village and London media-land - is trying to remember the last time they sat down and enjoyed a really good western. They're struggling, and it makes one or two suspicious that perhaps the Camerons are not being 100% genuine. Does the would-be prime minister really head home to Notting Hill after a day of politicking in Westminster and relax over an old John Wayne movie?

"Does he think that's what we do?" asks Louis, an IT manager whose time is taken up by work, a young family and coaching a children's football team at the weekend. "I don't get time to sit down and watch cowboy films. How come he does?"

For this group, at least, Samantha Cameron's cowboy comment is one of the stand-out moments of Trevor McDonald's much-hyped interview with the Tory leader. "It's all about making us think he's just like the rest of us, isn't it?" says Ian, a pharmacist who likes his politicians tough as nails and straight-talking. "It's what politics has become and it's a bit sad."

In truth, it was tricky finding people willing to leave their homes and stay up until midnight on a Sunday watching Cameron and talking politics (only 1.7 million tuned in compared with the 4.2 million who stayed up for Gordon Brown's interview by Piers Morgan last month). One or two of those who did turn out in my front room, in a small village in Wiltshire, clearly came to tell the Guardian just what was wrong with Cameron. But most did not have much of a view about the Tory party's great hope, and were interested in finding out about him.

The wood burner was lit, the beer, wine and cashew nuts - we pushed the boat out - were tucked into. To a few complaints, we switched over from Match of the Day 2 to find the Tories' version of Wayne Rooney jogging alongside a busy road and then a canal.

"He looks like a hoodie," says someone. "Who's he running away from? Trevor McDonald?" The Tories' not-so-secret weapon, Samantha Cameron, makes her first appearance. "She looks like Sharon Davies," is one instant opinion. There are giggles as the Tory leader walks on stage at the party's spring forum in Brighton to music by the rock band The Killers. And sniggers when one of his old mates talks about what a great pub pool player he is.

This audience doesn't swallow the line that Cameron is just one of them. When he mentions how his wife-to-be used to live in an "edgy" area of Bristol, someone wonders if it was Clifton - Bristol's upmarket equivalent of Notting Hill. And when Cameron describes William Hague as a grammar school boy, Brian, a retired businessman who now chairs the parish hall committee, almost chokes on a cashew. He used to live near someone who was invited to Hague's wedding and started voting Lib Dem after seeing the uber-posh shop that William and Ffion chose to manage their wedding list.

There is silence when Cameron talks about the death of his young son, Ivan. Several of the people here have children that age, and nobody thinks his pain is fake. But the one striking moment for body language watchers comes when Cameron starts like a bee has stung him after McDonald asks if he would resign should the Tories lose. Then more rock music kicks in, and the interview is over.

So, having started amid doubts and some cynicism, did Cameron's performance win any more votes in this corner of Wiltshire? "He's a likeable human being," says Louis, an IT manager.

"He is likeable," agrees Eamonn, a scientist who admits he has never sat down and watched Cameron before. "But I can't make up my mind whether he's the sort of bloke I'd like to have a drink with, or whether he's so really, really good at his job that he projects the image he wants to project. Either way he comes across well as a human - but you're not voting for a human, you're voting for a party. You're not voting for him as a nice guy, you are voting for him in the role as a politician and prime minister."

Louis was struck by how Cameron and shadow chancellor George Osborne came over. "In my job, I meet a lot of guys from small companies looking to do business, and they often come in twos. You can spot the inexperience and those two don't half look inexperienced."

Brian doesn't like Cameron's willing-ness to call himself a "salesman". "When you're PM you don't call yourself a salesman. You have to sell the country, I know that, but don't brag about it."

"But he is a salesman, not a statesman," says Brian's wife, Angela. She is a self-confessed Gordon Brown fan. Later she's pleased to spot that Cameron's hair seems to be thinning on top.

Ian wouldn't mind Cameron being a bit tougher. "I want to see him get hot under the collar, I want to see him getting annoyed. You don't have to be fire and brimstone, but sometimes you need to shout. If we have a coalition government, is he loud enough? For me, he's not animalistic enough." Eamonn disagrees: "You don't get to be leader of a major political party without having real steel."

James and Rebecca have been quiet. Brought up in New Zealand, they don't get why Cameron is having to work so hard to emphasise how ordinary he is. "We don't have this whole class hang-up," says James. "A lot of this programme has been him justifying his upper-class roots. That seemed to go through the whole interview."

Rebecca is puzzled by the idea, espoused by one of the commentators, of the Tories trying to get black and Asian people in the party to reach out to white liberal voters. "That seems a bit of an odd way to make yourself seem more multicultural."

And what did our panel make of Samantha? "Her being not being particularly sophisticated, that's almost a bonus for them," says Louis. "It's pure image and she's been coached," says Eamonn.

But what about his policies? "There were no policies in it," says Louis. "He might be a nice guy, but does it matter? What is it you're really voting for? You're not voting for bloody Samantha."

By the end of the evening - though it may just be the wine and beer - most of the group seem to be regarding Cameron just a little more favourably. Even Angela accidentally calls him "Dave".

"The programme softened me to the person," says Eamonn. "It softened me to the Conservative party," says Louis. Yet no one says their exposure to the Cameron charm offensive has made them change the way they are going to vote.

"It's the fundamental failing of democracy," says Eamonn. "People are allowed to vote on the basis of complete nonsense - 99.9% of people will vote on whatever whim they have."

Time to go home. Next morning, Louis's 10-year-old daughter Connie rings to have her say. She has caught up with the programme on ITV Player before school. Cameron seemed a "nice bloke" but she, too, didn't think much of him walking on stage to The Killers. She was also deeply unimpressed that he dismissed the fox-hunting protesters who follow him around with a joke.

"You have to listen to people," Connie says. Would she vote for him if she could? "Only if he made me believe he was going to improve things."

o Follow our interactive guide in the build-up to the election guardian.co.uk/politics

Steven Morris
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



  • Search
  • Titles only
  • Suggest a feed

  • Search all the blogs

    Powered by Google Coop Search

  • All
  • Big Media
  • English Blogs
  • N Irish Blogs
  • Official Parties
  • Proxy Blogs
  • Satire
  • Scottish Blogs
  • Welsh Blogs

  • N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    "And Then He Said..."
    'UK shamed again...'
    (NOT) Alan Milburn: MP for Darlington
    (Obsolete Feed)
    ......SHOT BY BOTH SIDES
    1169 and counting....
    1820
    24 Plus News
    25 years serving North Oxfordshire
    A Big Pile Of Awesome
    A Challenge to Liberals
    A comfortable place
    A Conservative's blog
    A Councillor Writes
    A Gentleman's Commonplace
    A Liberal Goes A Long Way
    A Logical Voice
    A neo-Jacobin
    a pEaCeFuL ReVoLuTiOn (john's blog)
    A Pint of Unionist Lite
    A Place to Stand
    A Tory in the Rhondda
    A Very British Dude
    A View from Middle England by Arden Forester
    Aberdare Blog
    Abolish the General Medical Council *(GMC)*
    Acid Rabbi
    Actually Existing
    Adam Brown
    Adam York
    Adloyada
    Admanumloquere
    Adrian Sanders MP's MySpace Blog
    Alastair Campbell
    Alex Ross
    Almost David Lepper, MP
    Alternative Medicine Campaign
    Ambrose Musiyiwa
    Amnesty Blogs: Belfast and Beyond
    An Englishman's Castle
    An Officer's Mess
    Anders Hanson
    Andrew Allison
    Andy D'Agorne
    Andy Love MP
    Andy Mayer
    Andy Reed MP News
    Anna Raccoon
    Anne Milton - Guildford MP (and Dipstick)
    Another Green World
    Antonia's blog
    Anything that defies my sense of reason....
    Armchair Socialist
    Arsembly
    Arthur Goring
    Arthur's Seat
    Arwen Folkes Blog
    Ask Marina
    Atu XVIII
       Stockwood Pete
    «Ethical Post»
    Backing Blair :: Campaign Weblog
    Backsplash
    Bad Ecology
    Bag's Rants
    baillieston independent!
    Bala Fria 冷ãŸã„銃弾
    Ballots, Balls and Bikes
    Balrog
    Battersea MP
    bazzfazz
    BBC Election 2005 | UK Politics | Weblog
    BBC News | Politics | UK Edition
    Beau Bo D'Or
    Bel is thinking
    Bel is thinking ...
    Ben's Blog
    Best of the Politics Blogs
    Bethnal Green Centre Support Group
    Bevan Foundation Blog
    Big Brother Britain & Civil Liberties
    Bishop Hill
    Bishopbriggs High - my view
    Blairwatch - Chronicling the Demise of the New Labour Project.
    Blairy England
    Blamerbell Briefs
    Blog
    blog dot org
    Blog of small things
    Blog.com
    Blogg
    Bloggerheads
    Bloggerheads: the Back-Up Blog
    Bloggers4Labour
    Blogging for Backlash
    Blogging the Beeb
    Blogging4Merton
    blogyk
    Blogzilla
    Blunt & Disorderly
    BobFromBrockley
    Boris Johnson
    Boriswatch
    Boulton and Co.
    Bridgnorth Sewage Action Group
    Bright's Blog
    Bristol South Lib Dems
    British Nationalists in Wales WATCH
    British Politics
    British Politics's Blog
    burberry chester bags
    Burning our money
    butler david
    By-Elections
    Cabalamat Journal
    Cabot Lib Dems
    CALEDONIAN COMMENT
    CALEDONIAN COMMENT
    Campus Radicals
    CarbonData
    Cardiff Blogger
    Cardiff Central Watch
    Cardiff Fabians
    Cardiff Fabians
    Carmarthenshire Planning Problems
    Cassilis
    Catch-13
    Chamberlain Forum
    charlotte street
    Charters & Caldecott
    Chester Conservatives Blog RSS Feed
    Chicken Yoghurt
    chimptron.com
    Chiswickite - formerly The Croydonian
    Chris Huhne MP News Stories
    Chris Huhne MP Press Articles
    Chris Whiteside's Blog
    Christina McKelvie MSP
    Ciara Leeming - words, photos and multimedia
    Cicero's Songs
    City of Salford Conservatives
    Civitas Blog
    CLASS WARFARE
    Cllr Andrew McConnell Blogging for Bedford
    Cllr Fraser Macpherson - LibDem Councillor for Dundee's West End - www.dundeewestend.com
    Cllr Iain Lindley's Diary
    Cllr Iain Lindley's Diary
    Cllr Richard Thomas
    Comical Tommy
    Conservative Commentary
    Conservative Education Society
    Conservative Party articles from Conservatives.com
    Conservative Party News from Conservatives.com
    Conservative Party speeches from Conservatives.com
    ConservativeHome
    Constantly Furious
    Cornish Pips
    corriganreid
    Councillor Bob Piper
    Councillor David Walker :: Working for Bridgnorth Morfe Ward all year round!
    Councillor Steve Wakefield - West Swindon
    coutries from other time
    CPF insight
    Craig Murray
    Cranmer
    Crust Of The Grouch
    Curious Snippets
    Curly's Corner Shop, the blog!
    Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg
    CymruMark
    Cymrumark's Plaid Blog
    cymuned.net
    Daily Referendum
    Daily Referendum - a vote on political topics in the news today
    Danger is my Middle Name
    Dark Matter Politics: open forum to discuss the forces influencing the world of politics and entertainment across the United States, Europe and Latin America.
    Darlington Councillor
    Darren Grover
    Dave, nice but knave
    David Davies MP blog
    David Davis for leader
    David Hanson is our MP
    David Jones, MP
    David Miliband | Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
    David Ottewell's politics
    David Reeves
    David Reeves
    David Reeves - Latest Blog Entries
    David Ruffley Local News
    DavidCameron.com
    Dead Men Left
    Delyn Democracy: The Political Watchdog
    Democracy How?
    Democratic thinking
    Derek Wyatt MP News
    Devizes Melting Pot
    DIRTY EUROPEAN SOCIALIST
    Dirty Leftie
    Disillusioned And Bored
    Disruptive Proactivity
    DistributionPolitics
    DistributionPolitics
    DistributionPolitics
    Dizzy Thinks
    DM Andy's Bits and Pieces
    Doctor Bloggs... The official online diary of Nasty Gnome Party
    doctorvee » Politics
    Don't trip up
    Downing Street Says
    Dr Sean's Diary
    Draconian Observations
    Drinking From Home
    Drive-by Times
    Drunken Blogging
    Dunderheadedness
    DunnIn
    Dyslexic with an axe to grind
    Ealing Southall Watch
    Earthquake Cove
    East Dunbartonshire Scottish Socialist Party
    Eaten by missionaries
    eBeefs: telling it like it is
    Ed Vaizey
    Edinburgh Sucks!
    eGov monitor - A Policy Dialogue Platform - Latest News
    eGov monitor - A Policy Dialogue Platform - Promoting Better Governance
    Election 05
    Ellee Seymour
    Elliott Joseph
    Emily Thornberry MP's Blog
    england gay kirkcaldy
    England the Land Equal Rights Forgot
    English Democrats news
    english ranter
    Epolitix News
    ePolitix.com - Interviews
    ePolitix.com - Legislation
    ePolitix.com - Stakeholder Interviews
    ePolitix.com Podcast
    Eric Avebury
    Eric Illsley MP
    Ermine For The Guvnor
    EUREALIST
    eurealist.co.uk
    Europhobia
    Everything Ulster
    Facts On The Ground
    Failed State
    Fair Deal Phil
    fdelondras
    FIGHT BACK - AN INTERNATIONAL, ANTI-WAR, SOCIALIST BLOG
    Fitaloon at MicroShaft
    Five
    Flashbuck
    Focus on King's Hedges
    Focus on Sodbury, Yate and Dodington
    Following restrictions on the use of the communications allowance this website is frozen from the 1 January 2010
    Forum Republica
    Forward not back
    Fourthterm.net
    Frank Dobson MP
    Free britain
    Freedom and Whisky
    freedom rules's blog
    freescotlandnow
    freethinkeruk
    Fremington
    Fremington and Yelland
    Fundamentalist Druid
    Futile Democracy
    Futile Democracy
    Gaffa's Blog
    Garden Grabbing in Cardiff
    Gary Barker Illustration
    Gary Barker Illustration
    Gary Barker's Illustration blog
    gathering
    GAUCHE
    Gav's View
    Gavin's Blog
    GavPOLITICS
    Gerald Howarth MP
    GidleyWatch
    Glasgow Kelvin Labour
    Glasgow Kelvin Labour
    GLC View
    glenda-jackson
    Glenn Goodall
    Goodballoon's paunch
    Gordon Brown
    Gordon Clown .Com
    government educational grant
    Grace Fletcher-Hackwood
    Grangetown Jack
    Green Cardiff - Pedestrians First
    Green the Health Service
    Greenman's Occasional Organ
    Guardian Unlimited: Election 2005
    Gus Abrams
    Guy Fawkes' blog
    h thisleadenpall
    Hands Off Our Future!
    Hansard Society - Promoting Democracy - Strengthening Parliament
    Hapless band of staff and regulars
    Harlow Liberal Democrats News
    Hartlepool 2004
    Heresy Corner
    Hertsmere Constituency Labour Party News
    Hogarth's Happy Hour
    holder
    Holyrood Chronicles
    Honourable Fiend: The UK Politics Blog
    Hot Ginger and Dynamite
    Hot Shot Hamish and Mighty Mouse
    Hove Labour 2005
    How This Old Brit Sees It ...
    Human Writes
    hung, drawn and quartered
    I Intend To Escape ......................And Come Back
    I Was Thinking...
    I, Celticus
    Iain Dale's Diary
    Iain Macwhirter Now and Then
    Ideal Government
    In Place of Fear
    incurable hippie's musings and rants
    Independence
    Independence First
    independence4scotland
    Independent: The Rise of the Non-Aligned Politician
    Infinitives Unsplit
    Informaticopia
    Inner Hippy
    Inner West
    inside out - a jaxxland perspective
    Inside Uplands
    Insidious
    Inveresk Street Ingrate
    Ivory's Diaries
    J. Arthur MacNumpty
    James Barlow
    James Cleverly
    James O'Malley... Living Legend » Politics
    James' Nasty Political Problems
    JamesCousins.com
    janestheone
    Jeff Ennis MP
    jennimarsh
    Jim Cousins
    Jim Millar
    jingoistic
    Jo Christie-Smith
    John Hayward
    John Hemming's Web Log
    John Leech Watch
    John Redwood MP
    JohnBM:Liberal
    Jonathan Wallace
    Joyce Acton
    Julie Morgan MP
    Justify This!
    Justin Wyllie's Political Blog
    Kate Hoey, MP for Vauxhall, has no website
    Kavin Davis
    KCL Conservatives - The Regalis
    Keetchwatch
    Keighley Councillor Judith Brooksbank's Blog Feed
    Keighley Prospective Parliamentary Candidate Nader Fekri's Blog Feed
    Keith Vaz, MP
    Kent Wood Councillor
    Kevin Maguire and Friends
    King's Hedges News
    Kirk Elder, Senior Citizen from Peebles
    Kirklees Unity
    Kitty Killer
    Klong Walking
    Kristofer Wilson
    Labour Matters
    Labour Party News
    Labour Watch
    LabourDoNotDo.com
    Labourhome - Stories by john prescott
    Labourservative Party
    LACHIE'S VIEW
    lambethlou
    Lancaster UAF blog
    Lancaster Unity
    Lancaster Unity Deconstructed
    Land Of The Nearly Free
    Latest Posts at LabourList.org
    Left Luggage
    Left Out Liberal
    LeftAlign
    LeftCentral
    Leicester Election 2005
    Leighton Andrews
    LENIN'S TOMB
    Les Bonner
    let's be sensible
    Letters From A Tory
    Lewis Moonie MP
    Liam Murray
    Lib on the United Kingdom
    LibDemBlogs
    Liberal Action
    Liberal Conspiracy
    Liberal Democrat News from Westminster
    Liberal Democrat Voice
    Liberal Democrat Watch
    Liberal England
    Liberal Polemic
    Liberal Review - Liberal Opinion, Commentary and Ideas
    Liberal Review - Liberal Opinion, Commentary and Ideas
    Libertarian Party UK
    Liberty Alone
    Liberty Alone
    Liberty Central
    Life after Ken Livingstone
    Lindsey's Blog
    Little Red Blogger
    Live from the Socialist Fortress
    Local Government Chronicle
    London Denizen
    Londonspot
    Looking for a voice
    Love and Garbage
    Love and Liberty
    Luke Akehurst's Blog
    Luke's Blog
    Lynne Featherstone's Parliament and Haringey diary
    mad musings of me
    Madeleine Bunting Watch
    Main Journal
    Make My Vote Count
    Mal Burns Monitor
    Malcolm Clarke - Labour Party
    Malcolm Redfellow's World Service
    Man in a Shed
    Mark John Young
    Mark Pritchard - The Blog
    Mark Reckons
    Mark's Edinburgh North & Leith blog
    Martin Cakebread
    Martin David From Across The Water
    Martin Linton MP | News
    Martin Stabe
    Martin Tod
    martin.bartos's blog
    Martyn Shrewsbury-Rowlands
    Mary Honeyball MEP
    Matt Buck's Hack Cartoons
    Matt Palmer
    Matt Palmer
    matty's blog
    Mayor of London blog
    MayorWatch®
    MediaPaL@LSE
    Medway Tory Watch
    Melanie Phillips's Diary
    Metaphysics As A Guide to Lunch
    Michael Clapham MP
    Michael Meacher - Labour's Future
    Mike Barker: Lib Dem politics in a northern market town
    Mike Cartwright's Blog
    Mike Wolfe
    Mike Wood
    mikemikemike99
    Mikey's Tent of Reality
    Militant Moderate
    Miserable Old Fart
    Miss Wagstaff Presents
    Moments of Clarity
    Most recent blog entries
    Moving Britain Forward
    Mr Eugenides
    MR MONKEY
    Mr Right Wing
    muckspReading - A satirical Look at Reading
    mudhook
    Munaeem's Blog
    Muscular Liberals
    Musings from Medway
    Mustaqim - Musings of a flying Imam
    muttering.co.uk - Voices of reason in a forest of stupidity
    My Random thorghts
    MyPetGoat
    mySociety
    Nadine Dorries Blogspot
    NatWatch
    New Direction
    New Northumbria
    New Paradigm
    New pledges - PledgeBank United Kingdom
    New Radical
    New Statesman Party Conferences Weblog
    Newid means change
    Newport East Watch
    News Diffusal
    News from Barking and Dagenham
    News Rage International
    News Rage UK
    newsBlog | Campaign for an English Parliament
    NHS Blog Doctor
    Nick Robinson | The Reporters
    Nigel Ashton News Stories
    No Borders South Wales
    no contact politics
    No geek is an island » Politics
    No PC Thoughts
    No police force mergers!
    NoBollocksPolitics
    Norfolk Blogger
    North to Leith
    Not Little England
    Not Proud Of Britain (But Would Like To Be)
    NotApathetic.com
    Notes from the Panopticon
    Notting Hell
    NuLabour
    Nunhead News
    oberonhouston.com
    Observations from the Hillside
    Oliver Kamm
    Oliver Postgate
    Olly's Onions
    Omar's Blog
    On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing
    On Liberty Now
    On Liberty, Online
    Once proud to be British
    One Man And His Gob
    Opinionated Blog
    optimum population trust news watch
    Orange By Name...
    Orange Music Team Blog
    order order moral order
    ORGANIZED RAGE
    ORGANIZED RAGE
    Paddy Tipping is my MP
    Parburypolitica
    parburypolitica
    Parliament Protest
    Party Political PLC
    Past Present & Future
    Paul Cumming
    Paul Hinks' Blog
    Paul Linford
    Paul Remfry, UKIP, Weaver Vale
    PC's Green Blog
    PCoE
    People's Republic of South Devon
    perfect.co.uk
    perfect.co.uk / UK Politics links
    perspective
    Peter Black AM
    Philobiblon
    Pickled Politics
    pigeon-post
    Pilton Sucks dotCom
    Pink Sauce
    po8crg
    Political & global comment
    Political Cream
    Political Cynic
    Political Paul
    political-reform-party
    PoliticalHackUK
    Politicalog - Fighting the Spin
    Politicians Outed
    Politics
    Politics As Sport
    Politics Cymru
    Politics news, UK and world political comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk
    Politics through the eyes of a teenager
    Politics Watch
    Politics, Piety and Polemics
    Poor Bastard Marvin
    Popular Alliance
    Post Political Times
    Postal Voting
    Power to the People! UK Politic's Blog, Commentary and Opinions
    Powered by Mambo
    Preston Liberal Democrats
    Prime-minister.org.uk*
    Program your own mind
    Progressive Politics
    prolix: blog
    Public Servant Daily - Latest News from the Public Sector
    Quaequam Blog!
    R W's Commentary
    Rachel from north London
    Radical Muslim
    Random Variable
    RCR UK - Blogs - Blogging Britain
    Reading List
    Reasons to be Impossible
    Red Box Blues
    Red Pepper's Election Blues
    Redlands Liberal Democrats
    Regno Defines
    Respect - the Unity Coalition
    Revalidating The General Medical Council
    rhetorically speaking..
    Rhondda Today
    Rhondda Today
    Rhondda TV
    Richard Arnold's Political Sketches
    Richard Herring
    Richard Spring MP
    Richard Taylor
    Ridiculous Politics
    Rob Fenwick
    Rob's Election Blog
    Romseyredhead
    rrn
    RSScache.com
    Rupert's Read
    Ruscombe Green
    Sadiq Khan MP
    Samizdata.net
    SAOIRSE32
    SAOR ALBA
    sarah teather is my mp
    Save And Repair Our Homes On Ashcroft Square
    Save The Ribble
    Schneider Home
    Scotland Independent
    Scotsman.com News - Politics
    Scotswahey!
    Scottienda
    Scottish Political Blogs Review
    Scottish Political News
    Scottish Politics
    Scottish Unionist
    Scratchings From The Sickle
    Second Life Left Unity
    Seismic Politics
    selectprivacy
    seren
    Shiraz Socialist
    Sian Berry
    Simon Goldie
    Simon Williams
    Slugger O'Toole
    Small Nation - Old Site!!
    Snide Clide
    snowflake5
    SNP Tactical Voting
    so now who do we vote for?
    Socialism or Barbarism!
    Socialism stinks
    Socialist Action
    Some Roses are Red
    Someday I Will Treat You Good
    Sonia's Diary
    South Wales Anarchists
    Southpawpunch
    Southside & Newington Newsblog
    Splintered Sunrise
    Splintered Sunrise
    spotter
    Spy Blog - SpyBlog.org.uk
    Spy Blog - SpyBlog.org.uk
    Staple Tye online
    Stephen Pollard
    Stephen's Linlithgow Journal
    Steve Beasant
    Steve Brine
    Steve of Stevenage
    Steve Pound Proxy Weblog
    Steve Reed | Steve's blog
    Stevenage Politics
    Stewart Stevenson - Working for You
    Stewart Stevenson - Working for You
    STFU or GTFO
    Stoke Labour Group
    Stop Veritas
    Straight Banana
    strange stuff
    Stuart Jeffery for Maidstone
    Stumbling Across The Truth - A Political Commentary
    Stumbling and Mumbling
    stv
    SUBROSA
    supermidge
    Surreal Scoop
    Surrey Tories
    Suz Blog
    Swedish Meatballs Confidential
    Swindon For Buckland
    Swinton South Liberal ------------
    Syniadau :: The Blog
    Tabloid Edition
    Tabman's Lib Dem Blog
    Taffia Don
    Tartan Hero
    Technorati Search for: uk politics
    Ten Percent
    The Choice Of A New Irish Republican Generation!
    The Apollo Project
    The Art of Politics
    The Awful Life of an MP's Wife
    The B.I.A. Fan Club
    The Blog of Kev
    The Blogspot Last Ditch Archives
    The Blue Idea
    The Bureau Of Sabotage
    The Cameron Leadership
    The Charity Blogger
    the common man
    The Conscious Earth
    The conservativehome.com blog
    The Cornish Democrat
    The Cowan Report
    The Cutting Edge
    The Daily
    The Daily
    The Daily (Maybe)
    The Daily Pundit
    The Daily Quail
    The despatch box
    The Devil's Kitchen
    The Diary of a Geek in Oxfordshire
    the Disillusioned kid
    The Dissenter's Voice
    The DYDA DISPATCHES
    The Edge of England's Sword
    The elephant in the drawing room
    The Empire Chronicles
    The Empire Chronicles
    The England Project
    The English Question
    THE FAULKNER JOURNAL
    The Fifth Estate
    The Fluffy Economist
    The Former Red Squirrel's Lair
    The Glass House
    The Green Ribbon
    The Grumpy Spindoctor
    the guisborough labour party
    The Heathlander
    The Heathlander
    The Insane Ramblings of Wonko The Sane
    The Intelligent Giving Blog
    The Irreverent Buddhist
    The Justice of the Peace [magistrate`s] Blog:
    The Labour Humanist
    The Learned Fool
    The Liberal Republican
    The Living Wage page
    The London Drummerboy
    The London Echo News
    The Lone Voice
    The Loneliest Jukebox
    The Mid-Atlantic Blog
    The Mysterious Case Of The Non-Existent Train Time
    The Nether-World
    The Northern Herald
    the orange party
    THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF MORTIMER
    The Polemical Report
    The political views of a 15 year old boy.
    The Pseudo Magazine
    The purple scorpion
    The Red Megaphone
    The Red Rag
    The Redcar Labour Party
    The Returning Officers
    The Rights Of Man
    The Road to Euro Serfdom
    The Salisbury Pages
    the sandals are off
    The Scottish Sketch
    The Sharpener
    The Skakagrall
    The smoking ban is shit
    The Spine -- The News With A Point
    The Third Estate
    The trawler Gaul
    The UK Today
    The Vented Spleen
    The Virtual Stoa
    The voice of young liberal democrats
    the void
    the void
    the VoxPolitics blog
    The Wardman Wire » Politics
    The Webb log
    The Whiskey Priest
    The Yorkshire Ranter
    the-morningstar
    the-rightapproach
    They All Speak English?
    theywanttobeelected: the manifestos BETA(i.p.)
    Things I Don't Have Time For
    Things Which Must Be Disseminated
    Third Way
    Thomas's blog
    thomasjpaul
    Tim Hicks - Blog: The (e)State of Tim
    Tim Yeo - The Weblog
    time-4-change
    toddler bedding
    Tom Greeves
    Tom Watson MP
    Tony Blair
    Tony Hatfield's Retired Ramblings
    Toque
    Tory Convert
    Tory Heaven
    Tory Radio
    ToryScum.com
    Toryteenager
    Toughen up Britain
    Transport Crucible . com
    Tribune Political Cartoons
    trinketization
    Tutor2u - The Politics Blog
    Tweetminster Livestream
    Two for Tea
    UK Bubble
    UK Change
    UK Comment
    UK Commentators
    UK Current Affairs
    UK FOIA requests - Spy Blog
    UK Freedom
    UK Freedom of Information Blog
    UK Future
    UK Green Party - the unofficial newsfeed.
    UK Issues
    UK News and Politics ... You Heard it Here
    UK News and Politics ... You Heard it Here
    UK Politics on the Left
    UK Polling Report
    UKIPwatch
    United LEFT
    Unlocking the Potential of Empty Homes
    Up Your Ego
    Uploads by theuklabourparty
    Vale of Clwyd Liberal Democrats
    Valleys Mam
    Very British (Political) Subjects
    View From The Ramparts
    Virtual Prime Minister
    Voice of Reason
    votao
    Vote for Ralph Crisp's MySpace Blog
    VOTE Scottish Socialist Party - Colin Fox
    Vowles the Green in Knowle
    Waking Hereward
    Wales - World Nation
    Wanabehuman
    Ward 87
    Wave Network
    We Perish If We Yield
    Welsh Independence
    Welsh Politics
    Westminster Wisdom
    Westmonster
    What the 'Eck
    What You Can Get Away With
    When IT Meets Politics with Philip Virgo
    WhenWillBlairGo.com
    Whittington's Diary
    wholly RUDE
    Winning Media
    Withington Co-operative Party
    WOMEN'S VOICE - LLAIS MERCHED
    Wonko's World
    www.paxmundi.info - Weblog
    www.politics.co.uk |
    www.the-vibe.co.uk
    Yellow Peril
    Zehra Zaidi
    Zeitgeist - The Spirit Of The Time
    Links
    About







    Created by Voidstar

    Inspired by ConventionBloggers