| http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/07/the_club_of_romes_limits_to_growth_was_right_you_know/ vs http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/02/limits-to-growth-was-right-new-research-shows-were-nearing-collapse About a new analysis of the Club of Rome's models: http://www.sustainable.unimelb.edu.au/files/mssi/MSSI-ResearchPaper-4_Turner_2014.pdf You decide. Can you spot the logical fallacies in each viewpoint? Or is it simply that with exponential growth, if the resource limits don't get you the pollution will? Always assuming there's enough excess energy available to fund the continued exponential growth in the first place. And if there isn't then there are other problems with a global system that borrows from the future on the basis that exponential growth can continue indefinitely. Bonus link: http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2014/09/depletion-case-of-gold-mining.html   Limits to Growth is a pile of steaming doggy-doo based on total cobblers »The Guardian praised it? Right, now we know for sure [from: Google+ Posts] |
[ << Space, says the introduction to the guide, is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely... ] [ Glenn Greenwald nails it again. >> ]
[ 07-Sep-14 3:06pm ]
